Springfield Sues MGM Resorts Over Casino Agreement

The City of Springfield has filed legal proceedings against MGM Resorts International, alleging that the company and Blue Tarp Redevelopment failed to meet obligations under their 2013 Host Community Agreement. MGM argues that the lawsuit is interfering with its planned transfer of ownership of MGM Springfield.

Springfield brought the case against MGM Resorts and Blue Tarp in Hampden Superior Court after negotiations between the parties failed to produce an agreement.

According to city officials, the two companies have not satisfied several commitments contained in the Host Community Agreement, including requirements covering employment and casino operations.

Among the obligations are maintaining a workforce of at least 3,000 employees, operating between 2,800 and 3,000 slot and video gaming machines, and providing between 75 and 100 gaming tables.

MGM said it notified Springfield officials in early 2024 that it planned to sell the property to another operator. The company maintains that it provided details about the prospective buyer and assurances that the existing responsibilities would continue following the transaction.

The parties have also discussed the proposed use of 101 State Street. MGM said it and the potential buyer were willing to consider converting the location into a hotel, although doing so would involve costs.

MGM maintains that the city’s legal action has held up the proposed sale. Springfield, meanwhile, says it attempted to resolve the dispute through good-faith negotiations before proceeding with litigation.